Box MS-027 Box 4

Scope and Contents

Marked as Volume XIV. Affidavit-in-reply on reply on behalf of State of Gujarat to the supplementary affidavit of the Petitioners filed on 16 January, 1995; in support of application for interim orders.

Scope and Contents Marked as Volume XV. Rejoinder Affidavit on behalf of the petitioner Narmada Bachao Andolan, to the counter affidavits of the Union of India and the states of Gujarat and M aharashtra to the application for interim relief of the petitioner. Includes rejoinder by TISS to the reponse of the Government of Maharashtra to their report; excerpts from projection completion report on Sardar Sarovar by World Bank; various figures and pages from reports; note, minutes and agenda notes; status report;...

Scope and Contents

Marked as Volume XVI. Application for direction regarding proceedings pending before the National Human Rights Commission contended to have substantially similar petition

Scope and Contents

Marked as Volume XVII. Report of the Five Members' Group - consisting of members Dr Jayant Patil (recused), Prof V.C. Kulandaiswamy, Ramaswamy R. Iyer, Dr Vasant Gowariker and L.C. Jain - on various matters related to the Sardar Sarovar Project such as the height of the dam and impacts on irrigation, power benefits, storage and displacement; resettlement and rehabilitation; environment and so on. Documents range from 1991 to 1995.

Scope and Contents Marked as Vol XVII. Appendices to the Five Members' Group Report. Includes Government Advocate's Letters; Supreme Court orders; communications from the Group; material provided to the Group; extracts from the Report of Charles Howard and Associates and that of the Wallingford Institute; Central Water Commission report "Sardar Sarovar Reservoir - Availability and Plans for Utilisation of Narmada Waters; Flow Series from 1891-92 to 1994-94; calculations by the NWDT in relation to the dlows;...

Scope and Contents

Marked as Volume XVIII. This volume consists of the affidavit-in-reply on behalf of the State of Gujarat with the pertinent enclosures. These include letters; statements; press cuttings; calculations and replies to annexures of the main petition. Notable mentions are the member for rehabilitation, NVD, Suraj Prakash; Academy for Mountain Environics; Thirumala Iyengar commitee; cuttings of "Fleeing the Camps" and so on.

Content Description From the Collection: Shripad and Nandini’s papers of the Narmada Struggle are arranged into five series. These are as follows: Writ Petition 319/1994; Writ Petition 328/2002; Resettlement and Rehabilitation cases and inter-state water dispute case; Publications and Public Outreach; and Correspondence. The bulk of the documentation pertains to the case Narmada Bachao Andolan vs Union of India and Others i.e. Writ Petition 319/1994. Advocate Prashant Bhushan and Shanti Bhushan argued the...

Content Description From the Collection: Shripad and Nandini’s papers of the Narmada Struggle are arranged into five series. These are as follows: Writ Petition 319/1994; Writ Petition 328/2002; Resettlement and Rehabilitation cases and inter-state water dispute case; Publications and Public Outreach; and Correspondence. The bulk of the documentation pertains to the case Narmada Bachao Andolan vs Union of India and Others i.e. Writ Petition 319/1994. Advocate Prashant Bhushan and Shanti Bhushan argued the...

Scope and Contents Marked as Volume XIII. Affidavit-in-reply on behalf of the Government of Maharashtra to the Supplementary Affidavit filed by the Petitioner. It consists of the state of Maharashtra's reply on issues of rehabilitation and resettlement in the state. Annexures include Rejoinder to Summary report of the Monitoring and Evaluation Team for Maharashtra prepared by TISS; comments on the TISS' report on field work in Akrani Taluka in Nov - Dec 1993; R& Statu at the proposed 80.3 metres pondage;...